To Lift the Painted Veil: Transparency in Nuclear Policy as the first step towards Deterrent Stability

By Vice Admiral (Retd.) Vijay Shankar

 This article was first published in the author’s monthly column on the Institute for Peace and Conflict Studies website

Lift not the painted veil which those who live call

life: ….(for) behind lurks Fear and Hope.

                                                                                    – Percy Bysshe Shelley

The Cold War Mantra

In September 1950, responding to a directive from the President of the USA to reexamine objectives in peace and war with the emergence of the nuclear weapons capability of the Soviet Union, the Secretaries of Defense and State tabled a report titled NSC-68. This report was, in general terms, to become the mantra that guided world order till the end of the Cold War and in particular formed the source that defined and drove doctrines for the use and proliferation of nuclear weapons. As a founding policy document of contemporary world order the memorandum contrasted the fundamental design of the Authoritarian State with that of the Free State. Briefly put, the coming clash was seen as a life and death struggle between the powers of ‘evil’ with that of ‘perfection’.

NSC-68 came at a time when the previous 35 years had witnessed some of the most cataclysmic events that history was subjected to; two devastating World Wars, two revolutions that mocked the global status quo (Russia and China), collapse of 5 empires and the decline and degeneration of two imperial powers. The dynamics that brought about these changes also wrought drastic transformation in power distribution with the elements of influence, weight and the means of mass nuclear destruction having decisively gravitated to the USA and the USSR. The belief that the USSR was motivated by a fanatic communist faith antithetical to that of the West and driven by ambitions of world domination provided the logic and a verdict that conflict and violence would become endemic. And thus was presented to the world a choice to either watch helplessly the end of civilization or take sides in a “just cause” to confront the possibility of Armageddon. World order rested upon a division along ideological lines, and more importantly to our study, the formulation of a self fulfilling logic for the use of nuclear weapons. The 1950s naissance of a nuclear theology was consequently cast in the mould of armed rivalry; its nature was characterized by friction and probing peripheral conflicts. The scheme that carved the world was Containment versus burgeoning Communism. In turn rationality gave way to the threat of catastrophic force as the basis of stability.

The Quest for a New Paradigm

Crumbling of the Soviet Union in the last decade of the twentieth century and the end of the Cold War killed this paradigm. In its wake, scholarly works suggested the emergence of one world and an end to the turbulent history of man’s ideological evolution. Some saw the emergence of a multi polar order and the arrival of China. Yet others saw in the First Iraq War, the continuing war in the Levant, the admission of former Soviet satellite nations into NATO and the splintering of Yugoslavia an emerging clash of civilizations marked by violent discord shaped by cultural and civilizational similitude. However, these illusions within a decade were dispelled and found little use in understanding and coming to grips with the realities of the post Cold War world as each of them represented a candour of its own. The paradigm of the day (if there is one) is the tensions of the multi polar; the tyranny of economics; the anarchy of expectations; and a polarization along religio-cultural lines all compacted in the cauldron of globalization in a state of continuous technology agitation.

China’s Two Faced Nuclear Policy

Uncertainties of contemporary times, rise of the irrational and the multilateral nature of nuclear relationships only served to enhance the role of nuclear weapons. What it did was to blur the lines between conventional and nuclear weapons at the same time it provided a warped incentive in asymmetric situations for the lesser State to reach first for the nuclear trigger. In dealing with 4th generation threats it underscored the significance of strategic non-nuclear weapons in adding pre-emptive teeth to a deterrent relationship.

The current situation has not left the Indian situation unimpaired. The two faced nature of the Sino-Pak nuclear relationship has put pressure on the No First Use (NFU) doctrine that that has shaped India’s policy and indeed its arsenal. For China’s stated NFU policy hides the First Use intent of Pakistan that the former has so assiduously nurtured. Forgetting the actuality of an enfeebled Pakistan civilian leadership incapable of action to remove the military finger from the nuclear trigger; the active involvement of non-state actors in military strategy and an alarming posture of an intention-to-use have the makings of a global nuclear nightmare. The Pak proxy gives to China doctrinal flexibility, it unfortunately also makes the severance of the Nuclear from the Conventional a thorny proposition that even China must know can boomerang on its aspirations.

Deterrent Stability: the First Step Transparency

We note thus far that nuclear relations in the region have been bedeviled by a persistent effort to combat the monsters that shrouds of covertness and perilous liaisons have cast; it has left us the unenviable task of, once again, permitting rationality to give way to the threat of catastrophic force as the basis of stability. It is time we saw the dangers of an Armageddon and embrace the opportunity that transparency presents as a first step towards deterrent stability and in the process to lift the precarious veil that is edging the Indo-Sino-Pak nuclear correlation to the precipice.

Advertisements

29 thoughts on “To Lift the Painted Veil: Transparency in Nuclear Policy as the first step towards Deterrent Stability

  1. Chinese strategists have stated quite explicitly that the essence of deterrence is ‘uncertainty’, based on ambiguity: You are deterred not by being sure of what I can do with the capability that you know I have, but by being unsure of what I will actually do. China has, of course, tutored Pakistan in the technology of nuclear weapons; she has now tutored Pakistan into being transparently uncertain in its doctrine.

  2. Snitchy-tranparency the first step, how far off to bringing it in practice – any efforts that have born creative responses?

    • Puddy,
      Nuclear weapons are not for use, but to deter use. Therefore the knowledge of intent lies at the core; this is where transparency clutches in. With the Chinese we have gone beyond the first step; it’s with the Pakis that we have acute problems. A single military point of control, in bed with jihadis and ambiguous underpinnings makes for a nuclear nightmare!

  3. Unfortunately Pakistan has further complicated the nuclear issue by lowering the threshold of a nuclear conflict by their crazy desire to introduce theatre nuclear weapons– Dread to think that some fanatic Maj or Col in charge of the cruise missile battery could start a nuclear holocaust in the sub continent!

    • Dear Jaggi,
      Thanks for your mail. You have hit the nail on the head. By decentralising and sending TNWs under field control, there is in actuality no control. We understand the military psyche; “aakhri goli tak” and for a weaker army, the aakhri goli comes pretty fast. It’s the reason why NATO and Russia pulled back TNWs from the European front.
      As always,
      Vijay

  4. Hello There. I found your weblog the use of msn. That is a very smartly written article.

    I’ll make sure to bookmark it and come bak to read extra of your helpful info.
    Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely comeback.

  5. Ηello there! This post couldn’t be written much
    better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous roommate!
    He continually қept talҝing about this. I ɑm going to forwaгd this post to him.
    Pгetty ѕure he’s goking tο have a very good read. Thank you
    for shɑring!

  6. Does your website have a contact page? I’m having a tough time locating it but, I’d like to send
    you an email. I’ve got some ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing.

    Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it grow over time.

  7. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in reality used to be
    a amusement account it. Glance complex too far brought agreeable frm you!
    However, how could we keep in touch?

  8. Have you ever considered publishing an e-book or
    guest authoring on other websites? I have a blog based upon on the same
    subjects you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information.
    I know my visitors would appreciate your work.
    If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an
    email.

  9. Great items from you, man. I have bear in mind your
    stuff previous to and you’re simply too wonderful.
    I really like what you’ve received right here, really like what you are stating and the way wherein you say it.

    You are making it enjoyable and you still care for to stay it smart.
    I can not wait to read far more from you. This is really a great site.

  10. Hi there would you mind letting me know which web host you’re utilizing?

    I’ve loaded your blog in 3 different web browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot quicker then most.
    Can you recommend a good internet hosting provider at a
    reasonable price? Cheers, I appreciate it!

  11. Wow, fantastic blog layout! How long have you been running a blog for?
    you make running a blog glance easy. The whole glance of your site is magnificent, let alone the content
    material!

  12. Hmm it looks like youг sitе ate my first comment (it was supr long) so I gueess I’ll juѕt ssum it up
    what I submitted and say, Ӏ’m horoughly enjߋying your blog.

    I too am an aspiring Ƅlоg writer but I’m ѕtill
    new to everything. Do you have any recommendaztions for
    first-time blog wrіters? I’d certainly appreciate
    it.

  13. I was more than happy to discover this site.
    I want to to thank you for ones time just for this wonderful read!!
    I definitely enjoyed every bit of it and I
    have you book marked to check out new information on your website.

  14. Hi there, just became aware of your blog through Google,
    and found that it’s really informative. I am ggonna watch out for
    brussels. I will appreciate if you continue
    this in future. Numerous people will be benefited from your writing.
    Cheers!

  15. We absolutely love your blog and find the majority of your post’s
    to be exactly what I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content for yourself?
    I wouldn’t mind writing a post or elaborating on a number of the subjects
    you write regarding here. Again, awesome weblog!

  16. I don’t even know the way I stopped up here, however I assumed this post was once great.
    I don’t know who you are however certainly you’re going to a famous blogger for those who aren’t already.
    Cheers!

  17. Hello! I’ve been folloaing your blog for some time now and finalky
    got the bravery to go ahead and givbe you a shout out from New Canney
    Texas! Just wanted to mention keep up the gfeat job!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s